Recursos semióticos y encuadre de temas: análisis del discurso multimodal de los discursos de investidura y de dimisión de Theresa May
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58859/resla.1251Resumen
Los discursos de investidura y de dimisión de Theresa May marcan, respectivamente, el inicio y el final de su mandato como primera ministra. Cuando pronunció su discurso de investidura, May contaba con un amplio respaldo de la opinión pública, mientras que su discurso de dimisión se produjo al abandonar el cargo de primera ministra bajo una gran presión política y social. Este artículo aplica el análisis del discurso multimodal a ambos discursos, explorando cómo se emplean los recursos semióticos para encuadrar temas y lograr múltiples efectos comunicativos. Se constata que: (i) se manipulan múltiples modos —incluidos el verbal, el visual y el vocal— para encuadrar el tema de la justicia social: en relación con los compromisos de May en el discurso de investidura y respecto de los logros en el discurso de dimisión; (ii) en lo relativo al Brexit, se utilizan diversos modos para expresar confianza y tristeza ante el fracaso en los dos discursos; y (iii) ambos discursos encuadran la cuestión de la unidad nacional, subrayando la importancia de este asunto. Los mismos temas, pero con encuadres distintos, producen efectos diferentes. Además, se observa que el modo verbal desempeña un papel dominante en el encuadre de temas, mientras que los demás modos cumplen funciones de apoyo diversas. Estos modos se entrelazan e integran para maximizar el efecto de este tipo de discursos.Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
19
Visualizaciones
|
5
Descargas
|
|
24
Total
|
|
Citas
Abuczki, A. (2011). A multimodal analysis of the sequential organization of verbal and nonverbal interaction. Argumentum, 7, 261-279.
Anthonissen, C. (2003). Interaction between visual and verbal communication: Changing patterns in the printed media. In W. Gilbert, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 297-311). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514560_14
Ariesta, N. R. (2017). Rhetorical proofs in the inaugural speeches of the United States Presidents and the first statement speeches of the United Kingdom Prime Ministers. Surabaya: Universitas Widya Kartika.
Augoustinos, M., Lecouteur, A. & Soyland, J. (2002). Self-sufficient arguments in political rhetoric: Constructing reconciliation and apologizing to the stolen generations. Discourse & Society 13(1), 105-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013001005
Aydin, S. (2016). De-Europeanisation through discourse: A critical discourse analysis of AKP’s election speeches. South European Society and Politics 21, 45-58.
Bahaa, M. (2007). Presuppositions and strategic functions in Bush’s 20/9/2001 speech: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics 6(3), 351-375. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.3.05maz
Bänziger, T., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication, 46, 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.016
Barry, A. M. S. (1997). Visual intelligence: Perception, image, and manipulation in visual communication. New York: State University of New York Press.
Beasley, V. (2001). The rhetoric of ideological consensus in the United States: American principles and American pose in presidential inaugurals. Communication Monographs 68(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128055
Belmonte, I. A., & Porto, M. D. (2020). Multimodal framing devices in European online news. Language & Communication, 71, 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.001
Benner, A. K., & Rothe, D. (2023). World in the making: On the global visual politics of climate engineering. Review of International Studies, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000025
Biria, R. & Mohammadi, A. (2012). The socio pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1290-1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013
Blackledge, A. (2006). The racialization of language in British political discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 3(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900600589325
Blommaert, J. & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
Bonacchi, S., & Mela, M. (2014). Practical remarks about the interoperability of the computer programmes Folker, ELAN and Praat for transcription and multimodal linguistic annotation from the user’s point of view. Journal of Multimodal Communication Studies, 2, 18-29.
Boychuk, A. N. (1994). The rhetoric of a resignation: A rhetorical analysis of Mikhail S. Gorbachev’s last five months in office using crisis rhetoric and apologia. Florida: Florida Atlantic University.
Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2016). Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Facial Expression Recognition, 41-64.
Calfano, B. R. (2009). Choosing constituent cues: Reference group influence on clergy political speech. Social Science Quarterly, 90(1), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00604.x
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.241
Chandiok, A. (1996). The impact of an unexpected political resignation on exchange rates. Applied Economics, 28(2), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368496328885
Cheng, L. & Chen, C. (2019). The construction of relational frame model in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s foreign visit speeches. Text & Talk, 39(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2022
Cheng, M. (2016). The power of persuasion: Modality and issue framing in the 2012 Taiwan Presidential Debates. Discourse & Society, 27(2), 172-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611556
Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Collins, C.A. & Clark, J.E. (1992). Jim Wright’s resignation speech: De-legitimization or redemption. Southern Communication Journal, 58(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949209372888
Cosmides, L. (1983). Invariances in the acoustic expression of emotion during speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(6), 864-881. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.9.6.864
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2015). Intonation and discourse. In D.Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 82-104). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch4
Cutler, A. & Jesse, A. (2021). Word stress in speech perception. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 239-265). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119184096.ch9
Dahl, T. & Fløttum, K. (2017). Verbal–visual harmony or dissonance? A news values analysis of multimodal news texts on climate change. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.09.003
Dancygier, B. (2023). Multimodal media: Framing climate change. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 220-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231154724
Dardis, F. E. (2007). The role of issue-framing functions in affecting beliefs and opinions about a sociopolitical issue. Communication Quarterly, 55(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701290525
Debras, C. & L’Hôte, E. (2015). Framing, metaphor and dialogue: A multimodal approach to party conference speeches. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 177-204. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.01deb
Doufesh, B. & Briel, H, (2021), Ethnocentrism in Conflict News Coverage: A Multimodal Framing Analysis of the 2018 Gaza Protests in The Times of Israel and Al Jazeera. International Journal of Communication, 4230-4251.
Ericson, D. F. (1997). Presidential inaugural addresses and American political culture. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27(4), 727-744.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In M. Handford, & J. P. Gee (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). London: Routledge.
Feld, S. (1984). Sound structure as social structure. Ethnomusicology, 28(3), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.2307/851232
Filippi, P. (2020). Emotional voice intonation: A communication code at the origins of speech processing and word-meaning associations? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 44(4), 395-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-020-00337-z
Finlayson, A. (2015). Proving, pleasing and persuading? Rhetoric in contemporary British politics. The Political Quarterly, 85(4), 428-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12122
Fónagy, I., & Bérard, E. (2006). Functions of intonation. Prosody & Syntax, 19-46.
Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gartner, J. E. L. (1973). A study of verbal, vocal, and visual communication. Columbia: Columbia University.
Gialdino, I. V. (2010). Labour, workers and work: Sociological and linguistic analysis of political discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(3), 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.491223
Gross, A. A. (2009). Presence as a consequence of verbal-visual interaction: A theoretical approach. Rhetoric Review, 28(3), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190902958792
Guenther, L., Brüggemann, M. & Elkobros, S. (2022). From global doom to sustainable solutions: International news magazines’ multimodal framing of our future with climate change. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2007162
Hadar, U. Body movement during speech: Period analysis of upper arms and head movement. Human Movement Science, 1991, 10(4), 419-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90014-O
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third Edition). London: Hodder Arnold Press.
Hahn, D. F. (1982). Ask not what a youngster can do for you: Kennedy’s inaugural address. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 12(4), 610-614.
Harrigan, J. A., Wilson, K. & Rosenthal, R. (2004). Detecting state and trait anxiety from auditory and visual cues: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203258844
Heritage, J. & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at Party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/228465
Hu, Y. (2020). Multimodal Framing: How multimodal elements influence framing effects in the debates of plastic pollution in the bottled water industry. Indiana: Purdue University.
Isaacowitz, D. M. (2006). Motivated gaze: The view from the gazer. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00409.x
Jerit, J. (2008). Issue framing and engagement: Rhetorical strategy in public policy debates. Political Behavior, 30, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9041-x
Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 14-27). London: Routledge.
Jongerius, C., Hessels, R. S., Romijn, J. A., Smets, E. M., & Hillen, M. A. (2020). The measurement of eye contact in human interactions: A scoping review. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 44, 363-389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-020-00333-3
Jungblut, M & Zakareviciute, I. (2019). Do pictures tell a different story? A multimodal frame analysis of the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict. Journalism Practice, 13(2), 206-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1412804
Katula, R. A. (1975). The apology of Richard M. Nixon. Today’s Speech, 23(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377509369193
Kaiser, N., Henry, K., & Eyjólfsdóttir, H. (2022). Eye contact in video communication: experiences of co-creating relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 852692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852692
Kendon, A. (2017). Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
Kowal, S., O’Connell, D. C., Forbush, K., Higgins, M., Clarke, L. & Karey, A. D. (1997). Interplay of literacy and orality in inaugural rhetoric. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025043620499
Kuo, S. (2001). Reported speech in Chinese political discourse. Discourse Studies, 3(2), 181-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003002002
Laver, M. & Benoit, K. (2002). Locating TDs in policy spaces: Wordscoring Da’il speeches. Irish Political Studies, 17(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003143
Lim, E. T. (2002). Five trends in presidential rhetoric: An analysis of rhetoric from George Washington to Bill Clinton. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(2), 328-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00223.x
Liu, F. (2012). Genre analysis of American presidential inaugural speech. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(11), 2407-2411. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.11.2407-2411
Lu, L. W. L. & Ahrens, K. (2008). Ideological influence on building metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088966
Maalej, A. Z. (2012). The ‘Jasmine Revolt’ has made the ‘Arab Spring’: A critical discourse analysis of the last three political speeches of the ousted president of Tunisia. Discourse &Society, 23(6), 679-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512452973
McGregor, G. (1982). Intonation and meaning in conversation. Language & Communication, 2(2), 123-131.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text, System and Structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mehrabian, A. (2017). Communication without words. In C. D. Mortensen (Eds), Communication theory (pp. 193-200). London: Routledge.
Moernaut, R., Mast, J. & Pepermans, Y. (2018). Reversed positionality, reversed reality? The multimodal Environmental Justice frame in mainstream and alternative media. International Communication Gazette, 80(5), 476-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048517745258
Nagel, F., Maurer, M. & Reinemann, C. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 833-850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01670.x
Nartey, M. & Ernanda (2020). Formulating emancipatory discourses and reconstructing resistance: A positive discourse analysis of Sukarno’s speech at the first Afro-Asian conference. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617758
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A. & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567-583. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952075
Nelson, T. E. & Garst, J, (2005). Values-based political messages and persuasion: Relationships among speaker, recipient, and evoked values. Political Psychology, 26(4), 489-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00428.x
Nelson, T. E. & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055-1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960149
Nelson, T. E. & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1238-1254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647553
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.) Companion to discourse (pp. 1-33). London: Continuum.
Pentzold, C., Sommer, V & Meier, S. (2016). Reconstructing media frames in multimodal discourse: The John/Ivan Demjanjuk trial. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.03.001
Reyes, A. B. (2014). Obama: (In) formality as persuasion in political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(3), 538-562. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.3.08rey
Rodríguez, A. R. (2008). Discursive strategies in Chavez’s political discourse: Voicing, distancing, and shifting. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990074
Salmon, C. A. (1998). The evocative nature of kin terminology in political rhetoric. Politics and the Life Sciences, 17(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400025351
Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12(2), 118-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2011.653504
Senju, A. & Johnson, M. H. (2009). The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009
Sigelman, L. (1996). Presidential inaugurals: The modernization of a genre. Political Communication, 13(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963096
Singer, M., Radinsky, J., & Goldman, S. R. (2008). The role of gesture in meaning construction. Discourse Processes, 45, 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802145601
Sitkoff, R. H. (2002). Corporate political speech, political extortion, and the competition for corporate charters. The University of Chicago Law Review, 3, 1103-1166. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600642
Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x
Smith, K. L., Moriarty, S., Kenney, K. & Barbatsis, G. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media. London: Routledge.
Soulaimani, D. (2018). Talk, voice and gestures in reported speech: Toward an integrated approach. Discourse Studies, 20(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618754419
Sparks, J. R., Areni, C. S. & Chris, C. K. (1998). An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion. Communication Monographs, 65(2), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376440
Stewart, P. A., Waller, B. M. & Schubert, J. N. (2009). Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9129-1
Talib, N. & Fitzgerald, R. (2016). Micro-meso-macro movements: A multi-level critical discourse analysis framework to examine metaphors and the value of truth in policy texts. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182932
Thomas, A. & Laffin, M. (2001). The first Welsh constitutional crisis: The Alun Michael resignation. Public Policy and Administration, 16(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670101600102
Tseronis, A. (2018). Multimodal argumentation: Beyond the verbal/visual divide. Semiotica, 220, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0144
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Vijay, K. B., John, F. & Rodney, H. J. (2008). Advances in discourse studies. London: Routledge.
Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261
WAUDAG: WAUDAG stands for the University of Washington Discourse Analysis Group: George L. Dillon, Anne Doyle, Carol M. Eastman, Susan Kline, Sandra Silberstein and Michael Toolan. (1990). The rhetorical construction of a president. Discourse & Society, 1(2), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001002004
Wessler, H., Wozniak, A., Hofer, L., & Lück, J. (2016). Global multimodal news frames on climate change: A comparison of five democracies around the world. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(4), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216661848
Wilson, G. L. (1976). A strategy of explanation: Richard M. Nixon’s August 8, 1974, resignation address. Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463377609369223
Worth, S. (2016). Studying visual communication. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Huiyu
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Términos de licencia pública para trabajos publicados
Todos los artículos publicados en RESLA se distribuyen bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), salvo que se indique lo contrario.
Esto significa que los autores conservan los derechos de autor y que cualquier persona es libre de:
- Compartir – copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
- Adaptar – remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.
Siempre que se cumplan las siguientes condiciones:
- Atribución – Se debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente a los autores y a la revista, proporcionando un enlace a la licencia e indicando si se han realizado cambios.
- Sin restricciones adicionales – No se pueden aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros el uso de la obra.
Para más información, consulte el texto completo de la licencia en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
